Whether you’re dealing with contract formation, claims, risk allocation or dispute resolution, our commentaries aim to give you a real-world view of how FIDIC provisions operate in practice and how they’re being shaped by today’s construction and infrastructure landscape.

FIDIC Commentaries

Explore our clause-by-clause analysis for:

  • The 1999 Suite – Red, Yellow and Silver Books
  • The 2017 Suite – Red, Yellow and Silver Books
  • The 2021 Green Book (soon to come)

Use the filters below to find the commentary most relevant to your needs.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 02 – The Employer

    Clause 2 outlines key Employer obligations, including access rights, assistance with permits, and financial arrangements. Additional obligations include payment (Sub-Clause 14.7) and taking over the Works (Sub-Clause 10.1). Employer claims require notice and compliance with Sub-Clause 2.5.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 03 – The Engineer

    Clause 3 outlines the Engineer's duties and obligations, including acting for the Employer, delegating authority (but not Determinations), issuing instructions, and handling Variations. It also covers Engineer replacement and making fair Determinations after consulting both Parties.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 04 – The Contractor

    Clause 4 of the FIDIC Red Book 1999 consolidates various Contractor obligations, covering 24 topics. It includes general duties and references other significant obligations scattered throughout the Contract, such as communications, assignment, document care, compliance with laws, and time for completion.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 05 – Nominated Subcontractors

    Clause 5 defines a "nominated Sub-Contractor" and allows the Contractor to object on reasonable grounds. If the Employer insists on employing the Sub-Contractor, it must indemnify the Contractor. Payments to the Sub-Contractor are certified by the Engineer.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 06 – Staff and Labour

    Clause 6 covers Staff and Labour, requiring the Contractor to comply with local laws, pay fair wages, provide accommodation, ensure health and safety, and maintain proper records. It also restricts recruitment from the Employer’s personnel and mandates qualified supervision.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 08 – Commencement, Delays, and Suspension

    Clause 8 covers the start of works, time for completion, delays, extensions, and suspension of works. It includes provisions for commencement, completion, progress, delay damages, and suspension, with updates from the 4th Edition Red Book.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 09 – Tests on Completion

    Clause 9 covers Tests on Completion, requiring the Contractor to give notice when ready to carry out Tests on Completion, addressing delays by either party, retesting after failure, and handling failures to meet contract requirements after retesting.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 10 – Employer’s Taking Over

    Clause 10 covers the Taking-Over of Works, Sections, or parts. It includes conditions for Taking-Over, deemed Taking-Over due to Employer's use or interference, and breach of contract if the Engineer fails to issue the Taking-Over Certificate.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 12 – Measurement and Evaluation

    FIDIC 1999 is a re-measurement contract, with the Employer bearing the risk of quantity variations. Clause 12 covers measurement, evaluation of rates, and valuation of omissions. It lacks a standard measurement method, which has been criticized.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 13.8 – Variations: Adjustments for Changes in Cost

    Employers avoid paying more under existing contracts, but forcing unprofitable work risks contractor insolvency. Contractors now seek protection from price fluctuations, preferring short projects or cost-plus letters of intent. Cost adjustment mechanisms, like FIDIC 1999 Sub-Clause 13.8, may help.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 14 – Contract Price and Payment

    Clause 14 covers payment aspects, including interim and final certificates, advance payments, retention monies, and the cessation of the Employer’s liability. It outlines the process for monthly payment applications, final settlement, and the Contractor's rights if payments are delayed.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 15 – Termination by Employer

    Clause 15 covers Termination by the Employer, including notices to correct, grounds for termination, valuation at termination, payment after termination, and the Employer's entitlement to terminate at will with 28 days' notice.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 16 – Suspension and Termination by Contractor

    Clause 16 addresses suspension and termination by the Contractor, including rights to suspend work, grounds for termination, cessation of work, and payment on termination. It specifies notice periods, conditions for immediate termination, and entitlements following termination.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 17 – Risk and Responsibility

    Clause 17 covers risk and responsibility, indemnities, liability limitations, and intellectual property rights. The Contractor bears risk during execution and defect remedy periods, with risk transferring to the Employer upon issuing the Taking-Over Certificate. Risk allocation depends on governing law.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 19 – Force Majeure

    Clause 19 covers Force Majeure and release from performance, with broader definitions than typical laws. It prescribes detailed insurance requirements, reducing flexibility. The Contractor bears most obligations, necessitating careful amendments and professional advice to avoid misunderstandings and ensure proper incorporation into contracts.

  • 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 20 – Claims, Disputes, and Arbitration

    Clause 20 covers claims, disputes, and arbitration. It includes procedures for Contractor claims, appointing a Dispute Adjudication Board (DAB), handling disputes, amicable settlement, arbitration under ICC rules, and actions when a DAB decision is not complied with or absent.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 01.15 – Limitation of Liability

    Clause 1.15, previously in Sub-Clause 17.6 (1999 Edition), is now separated from Risk and Responsibility. It exempts parties from liability for loss, including loss of use, profit, or contracts, with exceptions for certain sub-clauses, notably Sub-Clauses 8.8 and 13.3.1(c).

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 02 – The Employer

    Clause 2 now comprises 6 sub-clauses. New provisions, 2.5 and 2.6, have been introduced. The obligations and consequences remain unchanged. In Clause 2.4, the Employer can now specify financial arrangements, and the Contractor can request evidence under specific conditions.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 03 – The Engineer

    The main changes in Clause 3 are that: the Engineer may exercise its authority without the Employer's consent under Sub-Clause 3.7; and the Engineer must act “neutrally” under Sub-Clause 3.7. The intention is that the Engineer treats both Parties fairly.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 04 – The Contractor

    Clause 4 changes include defining 'fitness for purpose' in Employer's Requirements, adjusting the Performance Security, handling communications by the Contractor's Representative, setting subcontracting limits, enhancing health and safety obligations, redefining unforeseeable conditions, and increasing Contractor risk for access routes.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 05 – Design

    Clause 5 changes include specifying designer qualifications, moving part of Sub-Clause 5.1 to 1.9, changing "approval" to "No-objection" in Sub-Clause 5.2, and introducing a new procedure for addressing design errors in Sub-Clause 5.8.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 06 – Staff and Labour

    Clause 6 is similar to the 1999 version but adds Key Personnel, strictly regulated by the Engineer. Other changes include clearer employment laws, notice for work outside normal hours, enhanced health and safety roles, and improved record-keeping.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 07 – Plant, Materials and Workmanship

    Clause 7 of FIDIC 2017 mandates specified quality for plant, materials, and workmanship, requiring defect rectification. It covers testing, inspection, and rejection to ensure compliance. All sub-clauses have changed, with several significant modifications.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 08 – Commencement Delays and Suspension

    Clause 8 changes include enhanced Programme requirements, Advance Warning mechanism, no Sub-Clause 20.2 notice for extension due to Variation, further definition of adverse climatic conditions, acceleration methods under Sub-Clause 13.3.1, and a cap on Delay Damages lifted for severe misconduct.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 09 – Tests on Completion

    Contractors must prepare a detailed test programme reviewed by the Engineer. Clause 9.2 addresses delayed tests, applying Clause 10.3 for undue delays. Clause 9.2 adds procedures, including three Notices. Clause 9.4 expands failure criteria to include section rejection, complicating recovery under Clause 13.3.1.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 10 – Employers Taking Over

    Clause 10 changes include express references to As-Built Records, Manuals, and Training for Taking Over, a Notice of No-objection requirement, deemed Taking Over without these Notices, immediate issuance of Taking-Over Certificates, and a 14-day prevention period.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 11 – Defects After Taking Over

    Clause 11 has been clarified, with detailed provisions for notices and periods, DNP for Parts, and clearer time limits. Changes include risk allocation, compensation for denied access, and limited liability for Plant damage. Some cross-references may cause confusion.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 12 – Tests after Completion

    Clause 12 covers Tests after Completion, often required for process and power contracts. Tests are conducted by the Employer, with significant changes including competent staff requirement, testing per Employer’s Requirements and O&M Manuals, and new provisions for test timing and notice.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 13 – Variations and Adjustments

    Clause 13 clarifies the Engineer’s power to vary, allowing contractors to object to unforeseeable variations. Significant limitations include objections for health, safety, and environmental impacts. Variations must align with Employer’s Requirements, and supplemental agreements may be needed for significant changes.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 14 -Contract Price and Payment

    Clause 14 outlines payment, certificates, and release from liability. While the methodology remains unchanged, procedural adjustments may delay payments but aim for prompt claim resolution. Some changes benefit contractors: e.g. claims are addressed during or shortly after the contract period.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 15 – Termination by Employer

    Clause 15 introduces new grounds for termination: non-compliance with a binding Engineer’s Determination or DAAB decision; and maxing out Delay Damages (actual deduction not necessary). Uncertainty remains if EOT is granted post-termination, potentially affecting the legality of termination.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 16 – Termination by Contractor

    Clause 16 introduces new grounds for suspension and termination, including non-compliance with binding decisions and non-receipt of Commencement Date Notice. It addresses corruption, and clarifies termination grounds and procedures. Contractors gain protection against financial consequences and can claim profit loss.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 18 – Exceptional Events

    Clause 18 replaces "Force Majeure" with "Exceptional Events," aiming for clarity in civil law jurisdictions. Strikes and lockouts are now distinct from riots. The clause maintains natural catastrophes and clarifies that invoking it results in contract termination.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 20 – Employer’s and Contractor’s Claims

    The new Clause 20 distinguishes between main Claims, which follow a strict procedure, and other Claims, which are determined by the Engineer without strict procedural requirements, starting from the disagreement between parties and requiring only a Notice of Claim.

  • 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 21 – Disputes and Arbitration

    Clause 21 introduces a standing Dispute Avoidance/Adjudication Board (DAAB) instead of an ad-hoc DAB. The DAAB is appointed at the outset, assists in dispute avoidance, and its decisions are binding. The amicable settlement period is reduced to 28 days.

  • Green Book Commentaries (Coming Soon)

    We are pleased to inform you that a series of meticulously crafted commentaries on the 2021 Green Book will be published shortly. Our team is dedicated to providing you with insightful and engaging content. We appreciate your patience and look forward to sharing our latest updates with you soon.