Bridging the green – is FIDIC moving forward sustainably in 2025?

By |23/06/2025|

Introduction There is an intensifying need (we say rightly) for the construction industry, globally, to address climate change in line with global climate objectives. According to the UN, the buildings and construction sector is the largest emitter of greenhouse gas, accounting for about 37% of global emissions[1]. Focus was previously on decreasing operational carbon emissions[2] but is now also on mitigating embodied carbon emissions[3]. This requires collaboration of all stakeholders and innovative strategies to decarbonise building materials if the ambitious 2016 Paris Agreement's[4] net zero target is to be achieved by 2050. Most developed countries have taken a proactive and

Jurisdiction, Admissibility and FIDIC

By |06/11/2020|

An issue that often arises in international arbitrations involving the FIDIC forms of contract is whether a claimant's failure to: (a) go through the dispute resolution provisions; or (b) comply with a time-bar clause gives rise to a question of admissibility or jurisdiction. Put another way, if a claimant has failed to issue a notice of claim within 28 days or failed to refer a dispute to a DAB, does the arbitral tribunal have jurisdiction to make an award on the merits or should the arbitral tribunal make an award stating that it lacks jurisdiction?

Covid-19 and FIDIC contracts – what protections and entitlements?

By |22/05/2020|

Covid-19 has had huge consequences around the world and unfortunately this looks set to continue. In this article we consider the protection and entitlements (for Force Majeure and otherwise) which may be available to parties under FIDIC contracts for the pandemic and its consequences. We focus on the 1999 forms but briefly consider differences in the 2017 forms. We also consider the role that applicable laws may play and what parties should be aware of going forward. Force Majeure under FIDIC 1999 Under the FIDIC 1999 forms of contract, if either Party is prevented from performance of its obligations by

Damages at Large: Triple Point, FIDIC and the TCC

By |10/03/2020|

Triple Point was a case heard in the English Court of Appeal in March 2019 concerning the operation of liquidated damages clauses in the event of termination of a bespoke form of software contract. Sir Rupert Jackson gave the leading judgment, suggesting that where the contractor fails to complete the project, general damages at common law may be a more logical remedy than liquidated damages up to the date of termination, with general damages thereafter. This was a major departure from construction industry practice and understanding. Triple Point was considered by Mrs Justice Cockerill DBE in the TCC. It was held

FIDIC’S Golden Principles – holding back the tide?

By |10/03/2020|

FIDIC is concerned about its image. It says that heavily amending the FIDIC forms of contract impacts upon the FIDIC brand and that this is damaging FIDIC’s reputation. It seeks to address this with the introduction of five Golden Principles. But the Golden Principles are merely aspirational; they are not binding and have no contractual effect. Does this render them a pointless gesture ‘trying to hold back the tide’?

Pay attention Bond!

By |10/03/2020|

The recent English case Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation Europe Limited v Euler Hermes Europe SA (NV) [2019] EWHC 2250 (Comm) highlights that where an on demand bond is assigned and a demand then made under that bond, the beneficiary will need to be sure not only that the demand is compliant with the terms of the bond but also that the assignment was effective in the first place.

No EOT for Concurrent Delay, if so Agreed

By |21/05/2019|

Contract clauses that deny a contractor entitlement to an extension of time for concurrent delays caused by both employer and contractor are valid in principle.  In North Midland Building Ltd -V- Cyden Homes Ltd [1] the Court of Appeal of England and Wales has ruled that such clauses do not offend the common law prevention principle.  Nor do they give rise to an implied term to prohibit the imposition of delay damages that may result.

FIDIC contracts – What protection do they give contractors for employer financial problems?

By |21/05/2019|

In all construction contracts, one of the central principles is the Employer’s obligation to pay the contract price. The Contractor will be wary about the Employer’s financial standing and ability to pay and concerned to ensure that payments are made on time and that effective remedies are available in case of late or non-payment. The FIDIC standard forms of contract contain provisions dealing with these aspects.

Go to Top