2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 01.15 – Limitation of Liability

Clause 1.15, previously in Sub-Clause 17.6 (1999 Edition), is now separated from Risk and Responsibility. It exempts parties from liability for loss, including loss of use, profit, or contracts, with exceptions for certain sub-clauses, notably Sub-Clauses 8.8 and 13.3.1(c).

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 01.15 – Limitation of Liability

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 06 – Staff and Labour

Clause 6 covers Staff and Labour, requiring the Contractor to comply with local laws, pay fair wages, provide accommodation, ensure health and safety, and maintain proper records. It also restricts recruitment from the Employer’s personnel and mandates qualified supervision.

By |14/11/2018|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, featured, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 06 – Staff and Labour

Fitness for Purpose Højgaard and FIDIC’s Yellow Books

MT Højgaard is an important English case, considering fitness for purpose obligations in design-and-build contracts. This article examines the Supreme Court’s analysis of a fitness for purpose obligation in Højgaard and whether it would be applied to FIDIC’s Yellow Book contracts.

By |29/10/2018|Design, English Law, featured, FIDIC, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on Fitness for Purpose Højgaard and FIDIC’s Yellow Books

Variation Provisions in the FIDIC Yellow Book 2017

Much has already been written concerning the new FIDIC forms of contract published in December 2017. They are approximately 50 % longer and sought to set out the various procedure in much greater detail with the object of both encouraging good practice and reducing the scope for disputes. Numerous minor amendments have also been made. The purpose of this article is to look in more detail at the provisions dealing with Variations, these being amongst the most frequently scrutinised in practice.

By |29/10/2018|featured, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on Variation Provisions in the FIDIC Yellow Book 2017

Unintended Consequences of the FIDIC 2017 Clause 20.1 Claims Classification System

FIDIC’s 2017 editions introduced a new Claims management system in clause 20 that channels Claims through two very different procedures. One of them is very simple and involves almost no risk whereas the other will require investment of significant project resources, will take the parties a considerable amount of time to resolve and carries fatal consequences if not followed properly. It has therefore become a priority for anyone handling this Claims management system to understand how clause 20.1 sorts the different types of Claims and to recognise that the classification scheme is not as straightforward as the wording of the Contract suggests, as explored in this article.

By |29/10/2018|featured, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on Unintended Consequences of the FIDIC 2017 Clause 20.1 Claims Classification System

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 14 – Contract Price and Payment

Clause 14 covers payment aspects, including interim and final certificates, advance payments, retention monies, and the cessation of the Employer’s liability. It outlines the process for monthly payment applications, final settlement, and the Contractor's rights if payments are delayed.

By |26/09/2018|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, featured, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 14 – Contract Price and Payment

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 03 – The Engineer

Clause 3 outlines the Engineer's duties and obligations, including acting for the Employer, delegating authority (but not Determinations), issuing instructions, and handling Variations. It also covers Engineer replacement and making fair Determinations after consulting both Parties.

By |26/09/2018|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, Dispute Boards, featured, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 03 – The Engineer

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 16 – Termination by Contractor

Clause 16 introduces new grounds for suspension and termination, including non-compliance with binding decisions and non-receipt of Commencement Date Notice. It addresses corruption, and clarifies termination grounds and procedures. Contractors gain protection against financial consequences and can claim profit loss.

By |27/01/2018|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Dispute Boards, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 16 – Termination by Contractor

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 15 – Termination by Employer

Clause 15 introduces new grounds for termination: non-compliance with a binding Engineer’s Determination or DAAB decision; and maxing out Delay Damages (actual deduction not necessary). Uncertainty remains if EOT is granted post-termination, potentially affecting the legality of termination.

By |27/01/2018|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Dispute Boards, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 15 – Termination by Employer

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 03 – The Engineer

The main changes in Clause 3 are that: the Engineer may exercise its authority without the Employer's consent under Sub-Clause 3.7; and the Engineer must act “neutrally” under Sub-Clause 3.7. The intention is that the Engineer treats both Parties fairly.

By |27/01/2018|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 03 – The Engineer

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 19 – Force Majeure

Clause 19 covers Force Majeure and release from performance, with broader definitions than typical laws. It prescribes detailed insurance requirements, reducing flexibility. The Contractor bears most obligations, necessitating careful amendments and professional advice to avoid misunderstandings and ensure proper incorporation into contracts.

By |28/09/2017|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, featured, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 19 – Force Majeure

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 15 – Termination by Employer

Clause 15 covers Termination by the Employer, including notices to correct, grounds for termination, valuation at termination, payment after termination, and the Employer's entitlement to terminate at will with 28 days' notice.

By |10/05/2017|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, featured, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 15 – Termination by Employer
Go to Top