Mind The Gap: Analysis of Cases and Principles Concerning the Ability of ICC Arbitral Tribunals to Enforce Binding DAB Decisions Under the 1999 FIDIC Conditions of Contract

Published in International Arbitration Law Review This article is divided

By |01/01/2014|Arbitration, Dispute Boards, Knowledge Hub, Publications|Comments Off on Mind The Gap: Analysis of Cases and Principles Concerning the Ability of ICC Arbitral Tribunals to Enforce Binding DAB Decisions Under the 1999 FIDIC Conditions of Contract

Enforcement of DAB decisions – The legal justification for the ‘enforcement’ of a ‘binding’ DAB decision under the FIDIC 1999 Red Book

A previous article proposed that difficult questions arose from recent

By |01/03/2012|Dispute Boards, FIDIC, Knowledge Hub, Publications|Comments Off on Enforcement of DAB decisions – The legal justification for the ‘enforcement’ of a ‘binding’ DAB decision under the FIDIC 1999 Red Book

Are you in? Or are you out? An analysis of Section 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996: Appeals on a question of law

Parties should decide early whether to include court jurisdiction for appeals on legal questions in arbitration. Excluding court jurisdiction ensures finality, cost savings, and speed. Including it addresses concerns about arbitrators' legal interpretation abilities. The 1996 Act allows this choice.

By |01/01/2006|Arbitration, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on Are you in? Or are you out? An analysis of Section 69 of the English Arbitration Act 1996: Appeals on a question of law
Go to Top