Can a party ignore FIDIC’s DAB process and refer its dispute directly to arbitration?

If there is no DAB appointed by parties to a FIDIC 1999 contract, may disputes be referred directly to arbitration under Clause 20.8? This issue has troubled many in the industry – and has now been considered in English and Swiss courts.

By |17/11/2014|Adjudication / Dispute Boards / ADR, Arbitration, Dispute Boards, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on Can a party ignore FIDIC’s DAB process and refer its dispute directly to arbitration?

Indemnity Costs – you’ll be lucky! Interim Payment of Costs – definitely maybe

Even if a claimant has achieved complete success in litigation, it remains exceptionally difficult to recover legal costs on an indemnity basis, as this case demonstrates. Costs will most likely be recovered on the standard basis – at least in the absence of bad conduct during the litigation itself. This case also indicates that the court will generally limit an interim payment of costs to two-thirds of an approved costs budget.

By |12/11/2014|English Law, Knowledge Hub, Litigation|Comments Off on Indemnity Costs – you’ll be lucky! Interim Payment of Costs – definitely maybe

Light at the end of the tunnel? Gibraltar dispute reviews key FIDIC Yellow Book provisions

As disputes under the FIDIC forms of contract are normally resolved in private Dispute Adjudication Board (“DAB”) proceedings or confidential arbitration proceedings, reported FIDIC cases are rare and often of considerable precdential value either formally or informally. In this article, originally published in The International Construction Law Review, Victoria Tyson considers one such recent decision which was transferred from the Gibraltar courts.

By |14/09/2014|Arbitration, Dispute Boards, Knowledge Hub, Publications|Comments Off on Light at the end of the tunnel? Gibraltar dispute reviews key FIDIC Yellow Book provisions

Tunnel Vision: The English High Court Considers the FIDIC Yellow Book

The English Court considers termination and notice provisions under the FIDIC Yellow Book 1999. How are clause 15.1 notices to correct limited? Do termination events have to be repudiations? Is it fatal to serve notice of termination on the ’wrong’ address? When does the 28-day period under clause 20.1 start to run? Mr Justice Akenhead offers guidance to the industry.

By |01/09/2014|English Law, Knowledge Hub, Litigation, Publications|Comments Off on Tunnel Vision: The English High Court Considers the FIDIC Yellow Book

Mind The Gap: Analysis of Cases and Principles Concerning the Ability of ICC Arbitral Tribunals to Enforce Binding DAB Decisions Under the 1999 FIDIC Conditions of Contract

Published in International Arbitration Law Review This article is divided

By |01/01/2014|Arbitration, Dispute Boards, Knowledge Hub, Publications|Comments Off on Mind The Gap: Analysis of Cases and Principles Concerning the Ability of ICC Arbitral Tribunals to Enforce Binding DAB Decisions Under the 1999 FIDIC Conditions of Contract
Go to Top