CAB to Resolution: Steering Clear of Conflicts

In August 2024 SIMC introduced a new Integrated Appropriate Dispute Resolution Framework ('INTEGRAF') to help disputing parties "unbundle disputes and apply the most appropriate dispute resolution mechanism to each aspect of a dispute." This article considers INTEGRAF's applicability in construction projects.

By |28/11/2024|Adjudication / Dispute Boards / ADR, Arbitration, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on CAB to Resolution: Steering Clear of Conflicts

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 02 – The Employer

Clause 2 outlines key Employer obligations, including access rights, assistance with permits, and financial arrangements. Additional obligations include payment (Sub-Clause 14.7) and taking over the Works (Sub-Clause 10.1). Employer claims require notice and compliance with Sub-Clause 2.5.

By |27/11/2024|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, Dispute Boards, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 02 – The Employer

The Dangers of Employer Set Off in your FIDIC Contract: Suspension and Termination

If an Employer sets off certified but unpaid sums without following Sub-Clause 2.5, it may breach contract terms under FIDIC 1999. This article explores whether Employers can bypass the Engineer’s role and why the clause’s wording is crucial to both Contractors and Employers.

By |13/11/2024|Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on The Dangers of Employer Set Off in your FIDIC Contract: Suspension and Termination

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 01.15 – Limitation of Liability

Clause 1.15, previously in Sub-Clause 17.6 (1999 Edition), is now separated from Risk and Responsibility. It exempts parties from liability for loss, including loss of use, profit, or contracts, with exceptions for certain sub-clauses, notably Sub-Clauses 8.8 and 13.3.1(c).

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 01.15 – Limitation of Liability

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 14 -Contract Price and Payment

Clause 14 outlines payment, certificates, and release from liability. While the methodology remains unchanged, procedural adjustments may delay payments but aim for prompt claim resolution. Some changes benefit contractors: e.g. claims are addressed during or shortly after the contract period.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 14 -Contract Price and Payment

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 13 – Variations and Adjustments

Clause 13 clarifies the Engineer’s power to vary, allowing contractors to object to unforeseeable variations. Significant limitations include objections for health, safety, and environmental impacts. Variations must align with Employer’s Requirements, and supplemental agreements may be needed for significant changes.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 13 – Variations and Adjustments

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 12 – Tests after Completion

Clause 12 covers Tests after Completion, often required for process and power contracts. Tests are conducted by the Employer, with significant changes including competent staff requirement, testing per Employer’s Requirements and O&M Manuals, and new provisions for test timing and notice.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 12 – Tests after Completion

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 11 – Defects After Taking Over

Clause 11 has been clarified, with detailed provisions for notices and periods, DNP for Parts, and clearer time limits. Changes include risk allocation, compensation for denied access, and limited liability for Plant damage. Some cross-references may cause confusion.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 11 – Defects After Taking Over

2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 07 – Plant, Materials and Workmanship

Clause 7 of FIDIC 2017 mandates specified quality for plant, materials, and workmanship, requiring defect rectification. It covers testing, inspection, and rejection to ensure compliance. All sub-clauses have changed, with several significant modifications.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 2017 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 2017 Suite: Commentary on Clause 07 – Plant, Materials and Workmanship

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 16 – Suspension and Termination by Contractor

Clause 16 addresses suspension and termination by the Contractor, including rights to suspend work, grounds for termination, cessation of work, and payment on termination. It specifies notice periods, conditions for immediate termination, and entitlements following termination.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 16 – Suspension and Termination by Contractor

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 12 – Measurement and Evaluation

FIDIC 1999 is a re-measurement contract, with the Employer bearing the risk of quantity variations. Clause 12 covers measurement, evaluation of rates, and valuation of omissions. It lacks a standard measurement method, which has been criticized.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 12 – Measurement and Evaluation

1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 09 – Tests on Completion

Clause 9 covers Tests on Completion, requiring the Contractor to give notice when ready to carry out Tests on Completion, addressing delays by either party, retesting after failure, and handling failures to meet contract requirements after retesting.

By |13/11/2024|Commentaries on the 1999 Suite, Knowledge Hub|Comments Off on 1999 Suite: Commentary on Clause 09 – Tests on Completion
Go to Top